The EAT was asked to consider whether a tribunal had wrongly focused on what a claimant with ASD and ADHD could do, rather than had difficulties in doing, and also the bearing of his clinical neurodiversity diagnosis, when determining whether the claimant was disabled. Listen along to find out what happened!
Discover this selection of pieces specially chosen for you.
If your business buys a car, you won’t usually get tax relief upfront. Instead, most businesses claim relief gradually through writing down allowan...
Making redundancies is one of the most difficult decisions any employer faces. Done badly, it exposes your business to costly tribunal claims, repu...
