In this case, the Employment Appeal Tribunal was asked to decide whether an employer was liable for the sexual harassment of one employee by another when the harassment had taken place in the car of the offending party on the way to the other employee’s home, but where the other employee had mistakenly believed they should be working when in fact she was not and accordingly, the employer had neither sanctioned nor arranged the lift. Listen along to find out what happened!
Was employer liable for harassment which occurred during an unscheduled lift between colleagues?
Read Next
Discover this selection of pieces specially chosen for you.
A trio of tax titbits include Deliberately stupid, Slow processing and Tribunal decisions may slow to a dribble.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formally known as Prince Andrew, was stripped of his royal titles late last year as a result of his conduct. More recen...
Although this recent drama may be primarily familial in nature, Brooklyn’s recent statement suggests that it has also extended into the Brand Beckh...
A faulty email forwarding system cost HMRC (or rather the public purse) £134,000. Are there any lessons to be learned.
There’s no legal requirement to have a mobility and relocation clause in employment contracts but having this type of flexibility can be useful for...
